Post-doctoral Research Fellow Dr Sthembile Ndwandwe participated in the 16th Conference of the Parties (COP) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), in Cali, Colombia.

I was funded by the Bio-economy Chair at the University of Cape Town (UCT) to attend the biodiversity COP 16. A key aim of my involvement at COP16 was to coordinate and speak at a side event focused on a new initiative of UCT and the NGO People and Plants International (PPI)– Rethinking Biodiversity-based Economies for Conservation and Equity [for more details on the programme see https://www.rethinking-biodiversity.org/].

The side event was well attended, with participants from various sectors including government, business, and civil society. The focus of the side event was the role and future of Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) in biodiversity-based economies. Post-event discussions revealed significant interest in exploring diverse perspectives and alternative models for implementing ABS. This enthusiasm demonstrated the need for continued dialogue, research and innovation in this space.

Led by Prof Rachel Wynberg (UCT) and Dr Sarah Laird (PPI), the Rethinking Programme involves a range of partners who are addressing a significant gap in ABS conceptualisation and implementation. This gap relates to the fact that – despite a plethora of laws and studies about ABS – there have been no comprehensive analyses of the ways ABS impacts biodiversity conservation and Indigenous peoples and local communities. Nor has the nature, extent, and impact of benefit-sharing on reducing inequalities, alleviating poverty, and building scientific capacity been systematically researched. The side event provided the space for discussion of issues related to ABS and the governance of biodiversity-based economies, as well as conservation and biodiversity commercialisation; development and post-growth economic models for biodiversity conservation, use and commercialisation; and science, biodiversity, and equity.

I met an array of interesting people with wide-ranging roles and interests in the CBD space, with many showing an interest in the Rethinking Programme. I also attended the Business and Biodiversity Forum where I had the opportunity to learn more about the issues the private sector and investors face. Reflecting upon the Business and Biodiversity Forum and other business and biodiversity side events in Cali, I noted that many investors and businesses consider the notion of scaled commercialisation of biodiversity to be compatible with conservation and equity, despite conflicting evidence. Further, notions derived from the dated “polluter pays principle” persist as investors and business actors navigate implementing their respective targets in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF).

The energy for implementing the GBF targets was visible. I took this appetite for implementation as a challenge to us scholars and researchers to bring forward well-formulated alternative ideas and actions, that simultaneously deliver economic and multispecies justice in a practical sense. This could pave pathways beyond early CBD and sustainable development ideas that, quite frankly, have failed biodiversity and its custodians. At COP 16 there was a particularly high appetite for post-growth economy models and related thinking. Post-growth models can help identify viable ways that de-emphasise scale and elevate relational and emancipatory values in the commercialisation-equity-conservation nexus. In the Rethinking Programme, we are using post-growth approaches to identify alternative pathways for biodiversity economies and to open spaces for a collective critique of ABS as a development model and a market-led approach. This process can enrich key ongoing global initiatives, including the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services and the search for pathways to post-growth transitions.

On a personal level, I enjoyed the sessions on digital sequence information, and it was refreshing to see how engagement levels had progressed from COP15. However, much still needs to be ironed out regarding mechanisms for sharing benefits and ensuring equity in research. I was very disappointed in how the Global North dominates the CBD space, wielding disproportionate power – from plenaries to side events. It was painful to see the CBD and other conventions turn a blind eye to this coloniality, which they so willingly perpetuate.

I was also thrilled to reconnect with some of the youth I had engaged with in the African Wildlife Foundation Young Policy Fellows and those I met at COP15 – particularly the African Youth Biodiversity Network. Thank you all for your kindness, laughs, and hospitality. Also, huge thanks to the Rethinking Programme steering committee and the programme co-leads, Prof Rachel Wynberg and Dr Sarah laird for their guidance and rich contributions to the side event.

I also need to express my thanks to the people of Cali for their warmth and assistance in navigating the city.